[CISYSTEM] [MULTI THREADING] [SOCKET]
[DESIGN PATTERN] [SINGLE RESPONSIBILITY PRINCIPLE]
It is a long time ago I wrote the requirement specification for CISystem.
CISystem will be a client-server-network-application implemented in Java.
Now I have finished the architecture specification for the whole communication between the network nodes and between the threads within the the nodes.
This specification covers only the main part of CISystem.
I will specify how to implement the missing requirements in future posts, that's why I have started a new mini series of posts with this one.
In this post I want to explain
Design Decisions
Some ideas which I had described in previous posts have changed, e.g. that two nodes have to roll dices to decide which socket connection will be closed to have only one socket connection between two nodes. I still think its a good idea to do it like that, but I don't want to focus on optimization before I have running implementation.
My idea is to maximize the amount of parallel executed code and parallel communication by having a thread for every communicating object and to let the objects communicate via different lists, which shall reduce the amount of blocked threads by increasing the channels for communication. The synchronization of the threads will be done synchronizing on these communication lists.
My assumptions are
This leads me to my first four design decisions.
Design Decision 1 :
-------------------
Communication shall always be bidirectional using two lists.
An object writes to one list and reads from the other list.
Design Decision 2 :
-------------------
Every class shall have only one purpose.
Following the SOLID principles means for the architecture to follow the Single Responsibility principle.
There will application, resource and communication related classes.
In combination with Design Decision 1 this means several objects can communicate in parallel, because they block only the list they write or read.
The implementation of Design Decision 1 is explained below in Communication Between Threads.
The implementation of Design Decision 2 is explained below in Overview Of Threads And Their Connections.
Design Decision 3 :
-------------------
All communicating objects shall use the same type for messages, so all communication lists have the same type.
I call the messages pakets and their class CIPaket.
A CIPaket has a map.
To give you a better idea which data will be send around, I list the description of those keys I have already planned and give you some examples for their usage in the lower level of the enumeration.
Most likely the real keys and maybe some of the values will be numbers representing the position of a a key string in a Java enumeration, to reduce the need of network bandwidth.
I just mention this here to explain why I cannot show you the final Key/Value list here.
This shall just make it easier to understand the communication :
What this means becomes clear when reading about the other thread kinds.
Design Decision 4 :
-------------------
The nodes shall act like in a classic client-server-system but the network shall be fully interconnected.
The current server node is called active server.
All other nodes run their server applications in reading or recording mode.
All server actions are recorded by the server applications of all other nodes including a priority list who would be the next active server, so that every node can be the next active server if all other nodes in the list before it go down.
Network Communication
The network communication will be implemented with sockets.
Each node will be connected with every other node.
The connection will be bidirectional, every communicating object will read on one socket and write on an other socket.
Connection breaks will be detected by exceptions and the information about the breakdown will be distributed to all other nodes.
This is how the objects used for implementing the network communication will be connected :
Communication Between Threads
Communicating objects are connected via two lists for reading and writing in parallel, they synchronize on these lists.
A communication object uses objects with these two lists as communication channels :
public final List<CIPaket> toObject
public final List<CIPaket> fromObject
A communication object reads synchronized toObject and writes synchronized fromObject.
It's connected partner uses the toObject list for writing and fromObject for reading.
A reader always clears the list it has consumed.
Overview Of Threads And Their Connections
This overview shows you which thread kinds will be populating a node and how they are connected :
The Network Layer
A node has network layer threads, which do the whole communication with the other nodes.
Thread : Network Layer - Socket Master
The socket server thread listens to nodes requesting to connect and starts new socket client threads.
Thread : Network Layer - Socket Client
Socket Client threads have the duty to distribute the pakets to the whole network and to drop them when the paket id is already known from previous processing.
The network layer always sends all messages to all nodes, to enable every node as next server.
A fact : A client can always answer and grant access to any master when there is always only one server at the same time. We will come back to this point later.
A node processes always all new pakets by passing them to the paket layer
Here you can see the connections between Socket Server and Socket Client and between two Socket Clients :
Thread : Paket Layer
The paket layer passes the pakets to the correct server application and depending on the paket to a client application or resource pool.
Thread : Server Application
Server applications have the modes active and reading. They request resources and tell client applications to use them.
There can be different server applications, so you don't have to implement the client-server-protocol for all client applications in one server application.
All active server applications must be on the same node, all server applications on all other nodes are just reading.
That's why I wrote, a client can always work for every server if there is only one master active at a time.
Thread : Client Application
Client applications work for the server applications with resources blocked by the server application.
Thread : Resource Pool
The resource pools implement the provision and blocking of local resources. they provide resources to the server applications and answer queries from client applications if resources are really blocked for them.
How It Works Or What It Does
Let's assume we have this setup
which is
The information flow is now following the arrows :
I do not mention the reading server application at node B, but both requests in 1. and 3. and the result of the access in 7. are stored as well in the same type of server application at node B, so that when node A goes down, node B can take over.
I am very excited to start with the implementation.
In parallel I want to figure out how to visualize the coverage of the requirements, there are different options :
I will find a solution.
Page Updates :
20170902 : updated the example graphic, the socket thread labels send/receive were missing
The Blog
|
|
|
|
My Technical Blogs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projects
|
|
|
|
Blogs Of Friends
|
|
|
|
|
|
CV/About
|
|
|